Publications
Here you will find publications of the Committee for Public Information including the memoranda, reports and other material created in conjunction with or relation to the Committee’s operations.
Here you will find publications of the Committee for Public Information including the memoranda, reports and other material created in conjunction with or relation to the Committee’s operations.
Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK (ISSN 2490-161X (print), ISSN 2669-9427 (pdf)) publishes TENK's guidelines, recommendations and other material. The publication series was established in 2019. Print versions of the publications can be ordered from TENK's secretary.
The aim of the Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication is to encourage sharing research results beyond academia, support the national publication channels that enable multilingual publication, and promote multilingualism in the assessment and funding processes of research.
Responsible research promotes reliable and collectively accepted practices of producing, publishing, and assessing research results. It supports the transparency, presence, and utilization of science in society.
The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK guidelines 2019 (plain-text version)
These guidelines are applied from 10 October, 2019. A research organisation may commit itself to following these guidelines by signing the commitment form that is available on the TENK web page, www.tenk.fi.
Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity 3/2019
2nd, revised edition.
Violations of good research practices breach the principles of research integrity. They damage the quality and credibility of research and undermine research collaboration and authorship.
These actions may also be against the law, in which case they are investigated also in official or judicial procedures. Differences of opinion and disagreements over theories, methods or interpretations of results are part of academic discourse and generally not RI violations.
An RI violation meets one of the following criteria:
In Europe, there are several different national approaches available for investigating violations of research integrity. There are also countries which still do not have any national framework. There are basically two courses of action in determining scientific misconduct, investigating allegations and imposing sanctions: a model based on legislation and a self-regulation model by the scientific community.