7.11.2023
The study aims to scrutinize researchers' views on diverse and responsible assessment of researchers.
Subject term search
online
House of Sciences and Letters
On Responsible Assessment Day, you will hear presentation from
14.2.2023
The reference architecture for open science and research provoked discussion at a workshop held on 18 January.
13.12.2022
The outputs of the working groups have now been published in three languages. The three recommendations complement the policy of open scholarship and the previous recommendations.
24.8.2022
Important international policies affecting open science and research are collected on these pages.
CoARA
In July 2022, Science Europe, representing European research funders, published the Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment, which sets out new
27.6.2022
Content
National recommendation
Implementation plan
International collaboration
Steering group
Responsible Assessment
The Recommendation for the responsible evaluation of a researcher in Finland provides guidance on how to carry out the
Helsinki
The themes of the event this year are knowledge ecosystems and liable evaluation. The seminar is intended for all people working with e.g. bibliometrics, research evaluation, and research administration.
Join DORA on Friday, February 11, 2022 for a one hour webinar to discuss how research assessment reform may be viewed as a systems problem, and how the application of systems thinking can be leveraged to overcome barriers to implementing reform.
7.5.2021
Making FAIReR (FAIReR = FAIR + Responsible) researcher assessments possible - Final report of EOSC Co-Creation project published.
25.2.2021
Public Consultation of DRAFT Vision on FAIReR Assessments is now open until 15 March.
Helsinki
To foster responsible evaluation of research and researchers, Europe needs a vision, roadmap and data infrastructures for creating FAIR research data as well as making the data about research activities and merits FA
What will the reforms mean for researchers when applying for Academy funding or using the funding granted? How are the Academy’s new practices linked to national and international developments in science and research?