Skip to main content

Main navigation

Menu
  • Responsible Research
  • Open Science
  • Committee for Public Information
  • Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK
  • Publication Forum
Home
Subject term search
SuomiSvenskaEnglish

Tiedonjulkistamisen neuvottelukunta

  • Etusivu
  • State Awards
  • Public information grants
  • TJNK
  1. Home
  2. Subject term search

Subject term search

Questions of scientific communications and research ethics at the Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences
30.8.2019
The Helsinki Term Bank for the Arts and Sciences is an online service and tool for the production and publishing of information.
Johanna Enqvist
Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö
Open science
Publishing
Authorship
Effects and impact of research
Responsible Research
Open science is changing the practices of peer review
5.8.2019
The purpose of open peer review is to improve scientific communication and publishing practices.
Mikael Laakso
Riitta Jytilä
Open science
Publishing
Peer review
Responsible Research
Publishing an article-based dissertation
29.7.2019
Commonness of article-based dissertations means that universities need more competence related to publishing practices and copyright.
Anna-Sofia Ruth
Publishing
Copyright
Authorship
Responsible Research
10 facts about Publication Forum
19.5.2019
Publication Forum (JUFO) is a classification system to support the quality assessment of research output. 
Anna-Sofia Ruth
Publishing
Metrics
Funding
Peer review
Responsible Research
Agreeing on authorship: recommendation for research publications
29.11.2018
The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK recommends agreeing on the principles of authorship in good time to prevent disputes.
Responsible Research editors
Publishing
Authorship
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
A publisher’s view of authorship
24.8.2018
In science publishing, questions relating to authorship may once more become a topic of debate.
Tero Norkola
Tiina Onikki-Rantajääskö
Publishing
Copyright
Authorship
Science communication
Research misconduct
Responsible Research
Guidelines and codes for publishing
12.7.2018
Links to guidelines and codes for responsible publishing.
Responsible Research editors
Publishing
Science communication
Research misconduct
Research ethics and research integrity
Responsible Research
Good conduct guarantees the quality of peer review in science
19.5.2018
In peer review of scholarly manuscripts, authors, editors, and expert reviewers share responsibility for the success of the process.
Pauliina Raento
Publishing
Peer review
Responsible Research
How to avoid predatory publications?
19.5.2018
Predatory publishers charge a fee from authors but fail to perform the duties of an academic publisher.
Anna-Sofia Ruth
Publishing
Science communication
Responsible Research
The peer-review label aids transparency and consistency
19.5.2018
The peer-review label in a publication shows that the text has been peer reviewed in line with generally accepted quality and ethical requirements.
Anna-Sofia Ruth
Publishing
Peer review
Responsible Research
Open co-authorship of scientific articles
19.5.2018
What is open co-authorship of scientific articles and how is authorship defined in such cases?
Heidi Laine
Open science
Publishing
Authorship
Responsible Research
Communicating science can take time: textbooks and other professional literature
17.5.2018
Not all science communication is a high-speed performance. Slow tools are needed too.
Pirjo Hiidenmaa
Publishing
Science communication
Effects and impact of research
Responsible Research

Pagination

  • « ‹‹
  • ‹ Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • › Next
  • » ››

Committee for Public Information (TJNK)

Kirkkokatu 6
00170 Helsinki
Finland

info(at)tjnk.fi

Contact

Licensing

Feedback

Facebook-logo

Twitter-logo